 |
My head is spinning. On Paper is the _a href="http://qnmmhprofge.com"_detvnifiie_/a_ term. Those corporate toadies made it seem as if this is a win-win situation or Something like that.The corporations made all this $$$ out of the country where it doesn't get taxed? and so, if they Bring it Back, why not Reward their generosity (ahem) by not taxing it very much?I Think that's what they were saying.And Mike was saying: No, because they ship everything overseas thousands of jobs each month they make all this $$$ and then we want to Reward them for bad behavior!?!I'm really confused. None of it sounds good to me.The problem is, these ideas don't get a chance to be developed. Mike is correct in that if people of common sense could be made to understand these ideas, they Might agree w/him as long as they see corporations for the looters and pillagers they are.But Americans tend to be Pro-corporation, and I guess this show is part of the reason why.It's absurd to have 4 dingbats trying to talk over Mike.Have 1 dingbat try to debate him. THAT would be fair. Or, given that it's Mike, have all four, but give enough time for Mike to make his points. As it was, I could see Mike's point, but I found myself thinking -Well, gee, if the $$$ is going to Stay overseas Anyway, Why Not have it come back so it can be taxed?I KNOW that's not the truth, though. I know it's a scam. I just don't know HOW it's a scam, but my natural scorn for corporate looters helps me see through the bull shit as best I can.I'm glad Mike gets angry with these assorted jackasses.What he left out is Why the corporations want to bring back the $$$. What is the part that's Not on paper, that, if we Knew about it, wouldn't sound so good? I couldn't figure it out.I don't know if a thing I wrote makes Any sense. My head is too jumbled, today .
Rating:  [4 of 5 Stars!] |
|
|
